Letters

Letters to
the editor

The house always wins

If ever there were a salutary example of the corrupting power of money over integrity, it would be found within the grubby portals of the glittering gambling halls (Rick Morton, “Casino within a casino: Star’s extraordinary breaches”, September 17-23). If government truly represented citizens’ welfare, state-sanctioned gambling would not exist. But when government derives vast revenue from gambling, its duty of care appears subsumed by greed. Does this amoral revenue-raising justify the resulting devastation that enables addiction, mental health deterioration, domestic violence, poverty, relationship breakdown, fraud, corruption, organised crime and money laundering? It’s an abrogation of governance of the highest order. Yet, over and again, the scandals recede, the casinos retain their licences and, as Morton says, the house always wins.

– Alison Stewart, Riverview, NSW

Uncivilised rule of law

The idea that a state legislature would enact laws that target the sentences of a specific group of identifiable prisoners (“Justice withheld”, September 17-23) is contrary to the separation of powers principle in the constitution. Parliamentary supremacy over the executive and judicial arms of government was never intended to allow politicians to pass sentences directed at particular convicts. Otherwise we have Russian justice where the judges hand down sentences on individuals based on Vladimir Putin’s assessment of their offences. The result is brutal and autocratic punishment out of all proportion to the crimes. After the High Court established the principle in Kable that preventative detention orders undermine the integrity of the courts, the Carr Labor government successfully passed legislation that said all prisoners who were the subject of a non-release recommendation by the trial judge were to remain in prison for the remaining terms of their able-bodied lives. Two juvenile offenders, Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliott, aged 14 and 16 years respectively at the time of their crimes in 1988, were part of this cohort. They have now served 34 years in jail. Given their good behaviour in prison and their good health, Blessington and Elliott could spend decades more in prison for crimes that carried an average of 12 to 15 years in 1988 when they were jailed. Unjust punishment on this scale is unimaginable in a civilised common law country bound by the rule of law.

– Peter Breen, Bellingen, NSW

National approach

Thank you for your editorial “Brute force” (September 17-23). By the time I reached the conclusion, I felt my own deep sadness and despair on this front had been given voice. We need a (recurring) policing summit to bring all parties together to confront the institutional racism and sexism that underpins so much violence against First Peoples and the inept response to domestic violence and mental illness. We need a national approach to education, training and support for our police and better funding to ensure its ongoing implementation and efficacy. Without a focused and committed national approach, cultural change will never happen.

– Liz Morris, Kambah, ACT

King of truth

The British have bathed their empire in a golden glow but, as the voices of the colonised become increasingly vocal here and elsewhere, this glow is fading. Charles III has inherited the legacy of the empire. As Tom Keneally observes (“King tide”, September 17-23), he may not accept being a monarch of “no edges” as his mother was. He could become the king who encourages truth-telling across Britain’s former colonies, who helps bring to light the pain that so many suffered under British rule, and who apologises on behalf of his forebears. We can only hope.

– Chris Young, Surrey Hills, Vic

Opportunistic rises

While Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe identified there were problems with the RBA model, what he failed to point out was that inflation – the rise in cost of products – was not due to an increase in the cost of production (John Hewson, “High prices to pay”, September 17-23). It’s about opportunistic corporate business decisions in the event of the market being damaged by war. The flow-on effect to all other products drives inflation. Sure, the pandemic damaged supply chains and the floods on the east coast were all indicators of potential inflation problems, which the RBA missed. The question is whether monetary policy is an adequate mechanism into the future when such circumstances have a higher probability of occurring. Perhaps a prohibitive 80 per cent super profits tax is the additional government tool to crush societal disruptive business decisions in future.

– Trevor Pratt, Eaglemont, Vic

Letters are welcome: [email protected]
Please include your full name and address and a daytime telephone number. Letters may be edited for length and content, and may be published in print and online. Letters should not exceed 150 words.

This article was first published in the print edition of The Saturday Paper on September 24, 2022.

For almost a decade, The Saturday Paper has published Australia’s leading writers and thinkers. We have pursued stories that are ignored elsewhere, covering them with sensitivity and depth. We have done this on refugee policy, on government integrity, on robo-debt, on aged care, on climate change, on the pandemic.

All our journalism is fiercely independent. It relies on the support of readers. By subscribing to The Saturday Paper, you are ensuring that we can continue to produce essential, issue-defining coverage, to dig out stories that take time, to doggedly hold to account politicians and the political class.

There are very few titles that have the freedom and the space to produce journalism like this. In a country with a concentration of media ownership unlike anything else in the world, it is vitally important. Your subscription helps make it possible.

Select your digital subscription

Month selector

Use your Google account to create your subscription